Have you ever felt that your conversations with AI models like Claude, Gemini, or GPT could be so much better if you just knew the right way to ask? That's exactly what prompt engineering is all about. After diving deep into the comprehensive whitepaper "Prompt Engineering" by Lee Boonstra and the Google team, I'm excited to share these nuggets of wisdom with you. Whether you're a developer, product manager, or just an AI enthusiast, these techniques will transform how you work with language models.
What is Prompt Engineering (And Why Should You Care?)
Here's the thing about prompt engineering that blew my mind: You don't need to be a data scientist or machine learning engineer to do it well. At its core, prompt engineering is the art of crafting inputs that help LLMs generate the most accurate, relevant, and useful outputs possible.
Think of it like learning how to ask great questions. When you ask a vague question, you get a vague answer. But when you ask a specific, well-structured question, you unlock insights you didn't know were possible.
The whitepaper puts it beautifully:
"When you write a prompt, you are attempting to set up the LLM to predict the right sequence of tokens."
LLMs work by predicting what text should come next based on the input you provide. Your prompt is essentially guiding this prediction process!
Understanding the Control Panel: LLM Output Configuration
Before diving into prompt techniques, let's understand how to configure your LLM outputs. Think of these settings as the control panel for your AI interactions:
Temperature: Creativity vs. Predictability
Temperature controls how random or deterministic your results will be:
Low temperature (0-0.3): More predictable, factual, and consistent (great for coding, information retrieval)
Medium temperature (0.3-0.7): Balanced creativity and predictability
High temperature (0.7-1.0): More creative, diverse, and sometimes unexpected (ideal for brainstorming, creative writing)
I've found that setting temperature to 0.1 works wonders for technical tasks, while bumping it up to 0.7 helps when I need fresh ideas.
Sampling Controls: Top-K and Top-P
These parameters further refine how the model selects its next tokens:
Top-K: Limits the model to consider only the K most likely next tokens
Top-P (nucleus sampling): Considers the smallest set of tokens whose cumulative probability exceeds P
A practical starting point: temperature of 0.2, top-P of 0.95, and top-K of 30. This gives relatively coherent results that maintain some creative flexibility.
Fundamental Prompting Techniques That Actually Work
Zero-Shot Prompting: The Basics
Zero-shot is the simplest approach—just ask directly without examples:
Classify this movie review as POSITIVE, NEUTRAL or NEGATIVE.
Review: "Her" is a disturbing study revealing the direction humanity is headed if AI is allowed to keep evolving, unchecked. I wish there were more movies like this masterpiece.
Sentiment:
One-Shot & Few-Shot: Teaching By Example
When zero-shot doesn't cut it, show the model what you want with examples:
Classify movie reviews as POSITIVE, NEUTRAL or NEGATIVE.
Review: "The plot was predictable but the acting was decent."
Sentiment: NEUTRAL
Review: "I couldn't stop laughing! Best comedy of the year!"
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Review: "Her" is a disturbing study revealing the direction humanity is headed if AI is allowed to keep evolving, unchecked. I wish there were more movies like this masterpiece.
Sentiment:
This technique works wonders when you need specific formatting or reasoning patterns.
System, Role, and Contextual Prompting
These approaches set the stage for how the model responds:
System prompting defines what the model should do: "Return your answer in JSON format."
Role prompting assigns a character: "Act as a travel guide for tourists visiting Amsterdam."
Contextual prompting provides background: "Context: You are writing for a blog about retro 80's arcade games."
Advanced Reasoning: Taking Prompt Engineering to the Next Level
Chain of Thought (CoT)
One of my favorite discoveries was Chain of Thought prompting. By asking the model to "think step by step," you dramatically improve its reasoning capabilities:
When I was 3 years old, my partner was 3 times my age. Now, I am 20 years old. How old is my partner? Let's think step by step.
This technique is incredibly powerful for math problems, logic puzzles, and complex reasoning tasks.
Self-Consistency & Tree of Thoughts
These techniques build on CoT by exploring multiple reasoning paths:
Self-consistency: Generate multiple chains of thought and take the most common answer
Tree of Thoughts: Allow the model to explore different reasoning branches simultaneously
For complex problems, these approaches significantly boost accuracy by reducing the chance of the model getting stuck in a single line of faulty reasoning.
ReAct (Reason & Act)
ReAct combines reasoning with actions (like searching for information). It mimics how humans think and act to solve problems:
Reason about the current state
Take an action
Observe the result
Repeat
This approach is particularly powerful for tasks requiring external information or multi-step problem-solving.
Crafting the Perfect Code Prompts
When working with code, specificity is key. Here's an example of a great code generation prompt:
Write a Python script that:
1. Asks the user for a folder name
2. Gets all files in that folder
3. Renames each file by prepending "draft_" to the filename
4. Handles errors gracefully
Include comments explaining each section.
For debugging, provide the error message and ask the model to explain what's wrong and how to fix it:
This Python code gives an error:
NameError: name 'toUpperCase' is not defined
Debug what's wrong and explain how I can improve the code.
Best Practices That Transformed My Prompt Engineering
After experimenting with countless prompts, here are the strategies that consistently deliver results:
1. Provide Examples (They're Worth a Thousand Words)
Examples are the single most effective way to guide LLM outputs. They provide concrete patterns for the model to follow.
2. Design with Simplicity
Keep prompts concise and clear. If it's confusing to you, it's probably confusing to the model.
Instead of:
I am visiting New York right now, and I'd like to hear more about great locations. I am with two 3-year-old kids. Where should we go during our vacation?
Try:
Act as a travel guide for tourists. Describe great places to visit in New York Manhattan with a 3-year-old.
3. Structured Outputs for Consistent Results
For extracting or organizing information, requesting JSON output is a game-changer:
Extract the following details from this product description and return as JSON:
- Product name
- Price
- Key features (as an array)
- Release date
Description: The Sony WH-1000XM5 wireless headphones offer industry-leading noise cancellation, 30-hour battery life, and premium sound quality for $349.99, released in May 2022.
This approach:
Returns consistently formatted data
Reduces hallucinations
Makes parsing results programmatically much easier
Putting It All Together: My Prompt Engineering Workflow
Here's the process I follow when crafting important prompts:
Start simple with a zero-shot approach
Add examples if needed (one-shot or few-shot)
Specify the output format to control structure
Experiment with configuration (try different temperature settings)
Document and iterate
Test edge cases to ensure robustness
Remember that prompt engineering is an iterative art. Even small changes in wording can dramatically impact results.
The Power of JSON Outputs (My Secret Weapon)
One technique that deserves special attention is using JSON-formatted outputs. This approach has several benefits:
Consistency: Always returns data in the same structure
Reduces hallucinations: Forces the model to stick to a defined schema
Type awareness: You can specify data types for fields
Easier integration: Perfect for applications that need to process the output
When working with JSON outputs, I recommend including a schema in your prompt to guide the model:
Follow this schema for your JSON response:
{
"title": string,
"summary": string,
"key_points": string[],
"sentiment": "positive" | "negative" | "neutral"
}
Your Turn to Master Prompt Engineering! 💪
Now that you're armed with these techniques, it's time to start experimenting. The beauty of prompt engineering is that everyone can do it, and the best way to learn is through practice.
Begin by reviewing your existing prompts and applying these principles. Document your attempts, compare results, and gradually build your own library of effective prompts for different scenarios.
Remember that as models evolve, so should your prompts. What works perfectly today might need adjustment with next month's model update.
I'd love to hear about your prompt engineering breakthroughs! What techniques worked best for your specific use cases? Have you discovered other approaches that delivered outstanding results?